Bible Codes (ELS) made simple

A word to the reader

I did this study without any preconceived ideas of the “codes” being right or wrong. I merely looked at the facts, and wrote them as I found them.

Please read the document carefully before asking questions which are covered in the material. The material is not complicated, in spite of having a few graphs. Just read it.

What is it?

The best way to explain what the “Bible Codes” is, is by using an example.

Let’s take the first verse in the Bible, Genesis 1:1.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

We then remove all punctuation, spaces, and we make all the letters the same case (lower case or upper case). We end up with one long string of letters.

inthebeginninggodcreatedtheheavenandtheearth

We now start looking for hidden words (codes) in this string. One example is shown.

inthebe
G inningg O dcreate D theheavenandtheearth

If we start at the 8th letter, and we take every 8th letter, we find the word “god”. We started at position 8, and used a constant spacing (ELS) of 8. We now break the string into smaller pieces in such a way that the word is written top-down.

inthebe
G inninggod
inningg
O dcreatedt
dcreate
D theheaven

The word “god” that we found, crosses 3 other words, namely “beginning”, “God” and “created”.

inthebe
Ginninggod
inningg
Odcreatedt
dcreate
Dtheheaven

Other words can be also be found near this word e.g. the word “age”.

intheb
E Ginninggod
innin
G gOdcreatedt
dcre
A teDtheheaven

Different “theories” can now be proven (or disproved) usingthis information.

Note: If you find the word “branham”, and it crosses the word “prophet”, it does not conclusively prove
that William Marrion Branham was a true prophet of God.

The questions you should ask are:

Don’t jump to conclusions without having the facts.

Some logic

Let us look at the above example again

inthebeginninggodcreatedtheheavenandtheearth

The above string is 44 letters in length.

Let’s assume we want to search for a hidden word of 5 letters. If we started searching for the hidden word at the first letter in the string, we must be able to fit the remaining 4 letters of the word we are searching for into the rest of the string (43 characters) — else we will never find the word in this string. The maximum spacing between the letters is thus 43 divided by 4, which is about 11. (See the left side of the following graph.)

Example:
      I nthebegin N inggodcre A tedthehea V enandthee A rth

The offset (starting position) is 1, and the spacing is 10.

If however we started at the 9th-last letter, the maximum spacing would be 2 (the right side of the following graph).

Example:

     inthebeginninggodcreatedtheheavenan D t H e E a R t H

The offset (starting position) is 36, and the spacing is 2. If we had to draw a graph, it would look like this:

Graph shows a triangle, sloping down from left to right

The spacing on the left side would be 11 (44 divided by 4). On the right side it would be 2. The search word will only be found inside this triangle. The longer the word we are searching for, the smaller this triangle will become. (The right top side of the traingle depends on the length of the search word.)

The area graph slopes down quickly and then starts leveling out

The longer the search word, the less chance we have of finding the word. This means you would not find the phrase “williammarrionbranham” (William Marrion Branham) in the Bible Codes. The search phrase is very long, and thus
the chances of finding it are very small. (We did search for it, and did not find it.)

Commercial programs

Searching for these “hidden codes” will take very long. We need computer programs to help us with these searches.
There are commercial programs available that allow you to search the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament). Some allow you
to search the English Bible. Some programs are “freeware”.

Most of these programs have some limitations however.

The commercial programs ignore the top 99% of the triangle area

The commercial programs ignore the top 99% of the triangle area! They cut out the majority of the finds! In our research, we have found that they typically ignore 99.3% of the results, e.g. in the English Bible.

The question is: How can you make good conclusions if you ignore 99% of the facts? In fact, how can you make any conclusion?

Needless to say, we wrote our own program. (We did test this program with the available programs to ensure that the results were accurate.)

The results

In the following few graphs, we will show some of the search results done with the English Bible (King James Version). After
the spaces and punctuation were removed, the string was 3 227 544 letters in length.

Searching for the word “branham”, we found this word 655 times (forward search) and 612 times (backward search). As we were looking for “hidden codes”, the minimum allowed spacing was 2.

We then used a scatter-graph to plot the results (start position/offset vs. spacing/distance between the letters).

The word BRANHAM, searched forwards
Forward search — found 655 times

The word BRANHAM, searched backwards
Backward search — found 612 times

You can see the triangle shape as discussed previously. All the results lie inside this triangle. The size of the
triangle is exactly as expected.

Note the following:

Now compare these graphs with the one for the word “statist” (also 7 letters in length). This word was part of research into
the variations of the word “statisticalanalysis” (“statistical analysis”). We started with “s”, then “st”, then “sta”, then “stat”, and so on. We used the phrase “statist” because it has 7 letters (like “branham”), for comparison.

The word STATIST, searched forwards
Forward search — found 11947 times

We see that the density (how close together) of the “dots” is higher. The word was found almost 19 times more often.
The question is why?

Density of the “dots”

Let us do some statistical analysis of the King James Bible. We will count the number of times each letter occurs in the Bible.

Here are the results…

Letter

Occurrences

Percentage

A

275183

8.53

B

48589

1.51

C

54619

1.69

D

157791

4.89

E

410579

12.72

F

83335

2.58

G

54923

1.70

H

282400

8.75

I

193175

5.99

J

8787

0.27

K

22129

0.69

K

129512

4.01

M

79787

2.47

N

224246

6.95

O

242087

7.50

P

42895

1.33

Q

953

0.03

R

169278

5.24

S

189502

5.87

T

316406

9.80

U

83069

2.57

V

30339

0.94

W

65266

2.02

X

1449

0.04

Y

58274

1.81

Z

2971

0.09

Total

3227544

100.00

The results are obvious. The letter ‘e’ occurs more than any other letter. The chances of you finding a letter ‘e’ in the KJV is
431 better than finding the letter ‘q’. Depending on the letters in the “hidden” word you are searching for, you will find the density of the “dots” changing.

Now let us have a look again at our search words. The word ‘branham’ consists of letters that are found less often than the letters of the word ‘statist’. When we calculate the difference, we find that we are more likely to find the word “statist” than the word “branham” by about 19 times. Does this correlate with the findings? Yes. We found it was more than 18 times more. This explains why the scatter-graph was denser with the word “statist” than with the word “branham”. It is purely statistical. The even distribution of the “dots” also shows that this is a statistical phenomenon.

Formulas and reality

With our research, we also developed formulas that we can use to calculate (statistically) how many times a specific
word should occur in the string. We then used these formulas to predict certain words’ occurrences. We then ran our program to check if the predicted results were true. In all cases we were accurate in our predictions within 3%.

To predict the results for other languages and books, we simply check the number of times each letter occurs in the book. Then, using the updated table of statistics (like the table above), we apply the same formulas. Each time we were accurate within 3%.

Hebrew

The Hebrew language is far better suited to find “hidden codes” than most languages. This is probably why most programs only work with the Hebrew.

Conclusion

The “Bible Codes” (up to this point) is purely a natural statistical phenomenon that will be also be found for different books, languages and random letters. You will find the same thing whether you look at the Bible, the Koran, the Vedas, or “War and Peace”. You will find it whether you work with the Hebrew and the Greek, or in English. The number of times the “hidden” word occurs can be predicted by statistical formulas to within 3% accuracy. With this study we have thus not found any “hidden codes” in the Bible (or any other literature).

A future study (Part II) will address some other outstanding issues. Some researchers say that the “unique combination
of codes” or “proximity” in the Bible is the REAL proof of the codes. Research is being done on these issues, and will (Lord willing) be reported in a future write-up.

Please note that the above conclusion was reached by looking objectively at facts. It does not make an “unbeliever” (in Jesus
Christ and the Bible) of me just because the facts are not what you wanted to hear. You still need to get saved by faith in Jesus Christ. And faith comes by hearing the Word of God.
“… it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.” – 1 Cor 1:21

Many times we want to find the “hidden” secrets of the Bible, and choose to ignore the obvious simple facts that are plainly
stated. Start doing the ABC’s first, before trying to do ‘algebra’.